So Help Me…
Related posts:No related posts
G’day mate!
Related posts:No related posts
Friends and foes: Ideological social networking / Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks
Traditionally, online social network sites like Facebook and MySpace allow people to form links to "friends" but do little to qualify the semantic meaning of the friendship. As a result, many users "collect" friends on these sites, conflating "acquaintances" with "friends". Essembly, a "fiercely non-partisan social network", on the other hand, lets its users enrich the meaning of their relations to others by explicitly labeling them "friends", "allies", or "nemeses". Essembly then allows its members to post resolves reflecting controversial opinions on political issues. As a defining activity on the site, members can vote on these resolves on a four-point scale ranging from complete agreement to full opposition. We examined how the uncommon link semantics affects users in casting their votes. In particular, Essembly prominently highlights the activities of users' acquaintances, and the question arises if this makes them more likely to participate, and if so, how this information affects votes. It is widely assumed that social networks enhance, if not drive, the popularity of online services; what does an additional layer of link classification add to them?
Papers to appear at CHI 2008 and AAAI Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing 2008.
Related posts:
Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks...
Friends and foes: Ideological social networking...
Social network collaborative filtering...
Promoting contribution in peer-to-peer communities...
About...
Social Computing Summit in Miami, Florida in April, 2008...